Get ready for ISTELive 21! Launch the site now.
Creative Constructor
Lab Virtual
Leadership Exchange
at ISTELive 21
Edtech Advocacy &
Policy Summit

TPACK Leadership Diagnostic Tool: Guidance for Teacher Education Toward Technology Infusion

Listen and learn

Listen and learn : Research paper
Lecture presentation


Tuesday, December 1, 11:30 am–12:15 pm PST (Pacific Standard Time)

Dr. Arlene Borthwick  
Jeffrey Carpenter  
Dr. Jon Clausen  
Dr. Elizabeth Finsness  
Dr. Kevin Graziano  
Dr. Mary Herring  

This session highlights the JDLTE Outstanding Research Award Paper entitled, "TPACK Leadership Diagnostic Tool: Adoption and Implication for Teacher Education Leaders." JDLTE recognizes one article from the prior volume year with the highest possibility to advance the field of teacher education. Authors will provide the background that lead to the tool's development and discuss how institutions have implemented the tool in TPACK technology initiatives. Researchers will highlight the essential role of teacher education leadership in making future initiatives successful and share how the TPACK Leadership Diagnostic Tool can support continuing efforts toward technology infusion within teacher education.

Audience: Teachers, Teacher education/higher ed faculty, Library media specialists
Attendee devices: Devices useful
Attendee device specification: Smartphone: Windows, Android, iOS
Topic: Teacher education
Grade level: Community college/university
Subject area: Higher education
ISTE Standards: For Coaches:
Professional Development and Program Evaluation
  • Conduct needs assessments to inform the content and delivery of technology-related professional learning programs that result in a positive impact on student learning.
For Education Leaders:
Empowering Leader
  • Inspire a culture of innovation and collaboration that allows the time and space to explore and experiment with digital tools.
Visionary Planner
  • Evaluate progress on the strategic plan, make course corrections, measure impact and scale effective approaches for using technology to transform learning.
Additional detail: ISTE author presentation

Proposal summary

Framework

TPACK Leadership Theory of Action (Thomas, Herring, Redman, & Smaldino, 2013)

Theory of Action (Argyis & Schon, 1974)

TPACK Leadership Diagnostic Tool (Graziano, K. J., Herring, M. C., Carpenter, J. P., Smaldino, S., & Finsness, E. S. , 2017).

Methods

Qualitative
Content analysis
Participants: Leaders from Teacher education programs
Research Questions:
1. How was the TPACK leadership diagnostic tool used by education leaders during the implementation of TPACK-based initiatives?

2. In what ways did the TPACK leadership diagnostic tool serve as an opportunity to examine current practices and set realistic goals?

3. What are education leaders’ recommendations for the TPACK leadership diagnostic tool?

Results

The categories of the TPACK leadership diagnostic tool (the zone of wishful thinking, what can be controlled, and key leadership functions) were addressed by all the teacher education leaders during their interviews. Each element within these categories provided insights and raised additional questions into how leadership could move ahead with supporting TPACK-based initiatives. While the tool appeared to be useful for spurring reflection, it was not apparent that it was used as an essential reference during the implementation of participants’ respective initiatives.

Education leaders used the diagnostic tool to engage with others about their initiatives, to consider how physical spaces and personnel could be repurposed in support of their initiatives, and to think critically about prioritizing competing political, financial, and contextual demands. Results illustrate that leadership decisions were instrumental in the planning and implementation of TPACK initiatives.

Results indicate that effective use of the tool requires support, scaffolding, or even training.

Importance

Leaders need to thoughtfully reflect on how competing priorities
and resources, faculty time and attention, involvement of school partners, and the ever-critical policy environment can impact the development and implementation of their TPACK-basedinitiatives. Making time to consult elements, such as those outlined in the TPACK
leadership diagnostic tool, while leading the change process of TPACK-focused initiatives can help ensure that the initiatives are successful.

References

AACTE and Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2010). 21st century knowledge and skills in educator preparation.
Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/aacte_p21_whitepaper2010.pdf.

Adams, K. A., & Lawrence, E. K. (2015). Research methods, statistics, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.

Alliance for Excellent Education. (2018). Improving learning through collaboration: Future Ready Schools institutes.
Retrieved from: https://futureready.org/institutes/

Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring
the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656–1662.

Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.

Bennett, R. E. (2010). Cognitively based assessment of, for, and as learning (CBAL): A preliminary theory of
action for summative and formative assessment. Measurement, 8(2–3), 70–91. doi:10.1080/15366367.2010.508686

Brantley-Dias, L., & Ertmer, P. A. (2013). Goldilocks and TPACK: Is the construct ‘just right?’ Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 103–128. doi:10.1080/15391523.2013.10782615

Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP). (2016). CAEP standards for initial-licensure programs.
Retrieved from http://caepnet.org.

Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Leithwood, K., & Kington, A. (2008). Research into the impact of school
leadership on pupil outcomes: Policy and research contexts. School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organization, 28(1), 5–25. doi:10.1080/13632430701800045

Dexter, S., Herring, M., & Thomas, T. (2012). Editorial: Technology leadership for the teacher education initiative.
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 255–263.

Foulger, T. S., Graziano, K. J., Schmidt-Crawford, D. A., & Slykhuis, D. A. (2017). Teacher educator technology
competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 413–448.

Foulger, T., Graziano, K. J., Slykhuis, D., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Trust, T. (2016). The time is now! Creating
technology competencies for teacher educators. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24(3), 249–256.

Foulger, T. S., Buss, R. R., Wetzel, K., & Lindsey, L. (2015). Instructors' growth in TPACK: Teaching technology-
infused methods courses to preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31(4),
134–147. doi:10.1080/21532974.2015.1055010

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.
Chicago: Aldine.

Graziano, K. J., Herring, M. C., Carpenter, J. P., Smaldino, S., & Finsness, E. S. (2017). A TPACK diagnostic
tool for teacher education leaders. TechTrends, 61(4), 372–379. doi:10.1007/s11528-017-0171-7

Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2015). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Upper Saddle River,
NJ. Pearson

Harris, J. (2016). Inservice teachers' TPACK development: Trends, models, and trajectories. In M. Herring, M.

Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators (2nd ed.,
pp. 191–205). New York, NY: Routledge.

Herring, M. C., Thomas, T., & Redmond, P. (2014). Special editorial: Technology leadership for preparing tomorrow's
teachers to use technology. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(3), 76–80.

Hill, P., & Celio, M. (1998). Fixing urban schools. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.

Hine, G. S. C. (2014). Student leadership development: A functional framework. Journal of Catholic Education,
18(1), 79–110. doi:10.15365/joce.1801052014

Hord, S. (2017). Learning together for leading together. In K.S. Louis, S.M.

Hord, & V. Von Frank (Eds.), Reach
the highest standard in professional learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin/Leaning Forward.

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2017a). Educational technology standards for educators.
Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators#startstandards.

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2017b). ISTE essential conditions. Retrieved from
https://www.iste.org/standards/essential-conditions.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology
(Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–30). New York,
NY: Routledge.

Kolb, L., Kashef, F., Roberts, C., & Borthwick, A. (2018). Challenges to creating and sustaining effective technology
integration in teacher education programs. Retrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/edtechtprep/.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School
Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27–42. doi:10.1080/13632430701800060

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy.
Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496–528. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321501

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating
technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-
9620.2006.00684.x

Mouza, C., Karchmer-Klein, R., Nandakumar, R., Ozden, S. Y., & Hu, L. (2014). Investigating the impact of an
integrated approach to the development of preservice teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge
(TPACK). Computers & Education, 71, 206–221. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.020

Porras-Hernandez, L. H., & Salinas-Amescua, B. (2013). Strengthening TPACK: A broader notion of context and
the use of teacher’s narratives to reveal knowledge construction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48,
223–244. doi:10.2190/ec.48.2.f

Roberts, N. (1985). Transforming leadership: A process of collective action. Human Relations, 38(11), 1023–1046.
doi:10.1177/001872678503801103
Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education
Volume 0 Number 0 | Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education | 15

Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK):
A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186–210. doi:10.1080/
15391523.2015.1052663

Salaway, G. (1987). An organizational learning approach to information systems development. MIS Quarterly,
11(2), 245–264. doi:10.2307/249370

Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological
pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice
teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. doi:10.1080/
15391523.2009.10782544

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2),
4–31. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004

Swallow, J. C., & Olofson, M. W. (2017). Contextual understandings in the TPACK framework. Journal of
Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), 228–244. doi:10.1080/15391523.2017.1347537

Tondeur, J., Roblin, N. P., van Braak, J., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge
in teacher education: In search of a new curriculum. Educational Studies, 39(2), 239–243. doi:10.1080/
03055698.2012.713548

Thomas, T., Herring, M., Redmond, P., & Smaldino, S. (2013). Innovation, change, and technology: The evolution
of a leadership module to develop TPACK ready teacher candidates. TechTrends, 57(5), 55–63. doi:
10.1007/s11528-013-0692-7

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2016). Advancing educational technology in
teacher preparation: Policy brief. Retrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/teacherprep/.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in
education: 2017 national education technology plan update. Retrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/
NETP17.pdf.

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content
knowledge: A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. doi:10.1111/
j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Wetzel, K., & Marshall, S. (2011). TPACK goes to sixth grade: Lessons from a middle school teacher in a hightechnology-
access classroom. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(2), 73–81. doi:10.1080/
21532974.2011.10784683

More [+]

Presenters

Photo
Dr. Arlene Borthwick, National College of Education at National Louis University

Arlene Borthwick, co-editor of Championing Technology Infusion in Teacher Preparation: A Framework for Supporting Future Educators (ISTE, 2020), is Professor Emerita and former Associate Dean and Professor at the National College of Education, National Louis University in Chicago. She has served as chair of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education’s Committee on Innovation and Technology and member of the ISTE Board of Directors. She received the ISTE “Making IT Happen” award in 2008.

Photo
Jeffrey Carpenter, Elon University
Photo
Dr. Jon Clausen, Ball State University

Jon M. Clausen is an associate professor of educational technology and secondary education at Ball State University Teachers College. He is a current member of the AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology, teaches undergraduate and graduate educational technology courses. His areas of research have focused on technology integration & infusion. Specifically, developing the instructional contexts that support learning and teaching with technology. Jon works with pre-service and in-service teachers to think critically about instructional technology use to support student learning, while encouraging creative problem-solving, modeling, and providing students with choice and voice in the projects they construct.

Photo
Dr. Elizabeth Finsness, Director of Field & International Exp.

Elizabeth Finsness is an associate professor and director for the office of Field and International Experiences for Minnesota State University, Mankato. She is a previous member of the AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology. Her areas of research have focused on technology integration & innovation and she is a previous recipient of the TIES Technology Director of the year award. Her current research focus is on racial equity and social justice. Elizabeth works with pre-service teachers to think critically about race and social constructs.

Photo
Dr. Kevin Graziano, Nevada State College
Photo
Dr. Mary Herring, University Of Northern Iowa

People also viewed

Follow the Yellow Brick Road to Personalized Learning
P.D. Magic: Applying the Best Practices of The Walt Disney Co.
Take Care of You: Apps and Tools to Support Self-Care

Testimonials