Menu
By the end of the panel presentation, participants will:
1. Be introduced to practical and effective strategies for integrating technology into their teaching methods, drawing from successful experiences in higher education.
2. Be able to discuss and identify challenges with the new resources and approaches we present, such as teaching college students to effectively use AI in their own learning and teaching.
3. Explore new trends in educational technology and how they can be applied in higher education settings. This, for example, will include examining a new rubric for assessing the use of technology in teaching.
4.Consider collaboration among educators, administrators, and technology specialists in developing and implementing technology-driven teaching solutions.
5. Explore issues of inclusion and accessibility in technology-enhanced teaching and research in higher education.
Station topics will include (among other topics):
Introduction of a rubric (based on the ISTE Standards) that allows teachers to self-reflect on how they are utilizing technology in their daily classrooms, and if it is the most effective use of technology.
Designing online asynchronous courses so they don't add to student cognitive overload.
Bringing student teachers into the world of AI.
Straddling the face-to-face and online spheres: changes in student course expectations since COVID.
Infusing technology and the ISTE Standards into methods courses
We will be adding to this research as we add presenters to our playground:
Bhattacharya, K. (2017). Fundamentals of qualitative research: A practical guide. Routledge.
Buss, R. R., Wetzel, K., Foulger, T. S., & Lindsey, L. (2015) Preparing teachers to integrate technology into K–12 instruction: Comparing a stand-alone technology course with a technology-infused approach, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31:4, 160-172, DOI: 10.1080/21532974.2015.1055012
Buss, R. R., Foulger, T. S., Wetzel, K. & Lindsey, L. (2018) Preparing teachers to integrate technology into K–12 Instruction II: Examining the effects of technology-infused methods courses and student teaching, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34:3, 134-150, DOI: 10.1080/21532974.2018.1437852
Chang, H., Wambura Ngunjiri, F., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Routledge.
“ISTE Standards: Educators.” ISTE, www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards-for-teachers.
Missouri teacher standards alignment with INTASC and ISTE standards 1. (n.d.). Retrieved May 25, 2022, from https://www.missouristate.edu/assets/caep/1-1-1_StandardsAlignment.pdf
NAEYC (2013). Technology and Interactive Media as Tools in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8.
https://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/globally-shared/downloads/PDFs/resources/position-statements/ps_technology.pdf
Salman, J. (2023, June 8). How college educators are using AI in the classroom. The Hechinger Report. https://hechingerreport.org/how-educators-are-using-ai-in-the-classroom/
Tolliver, S. R. (2022). Recovering Black storytelling in qualitative research: endarkened storywork. Routledge.
U.S. Department of Education and ISTE Launch Initiative to Improve Tech Proficiency of New Teachers to Increase Digital Equity, 2022, ISTE
https://www.iste.org/explore/press-releases/us-department-education-and-iste-launch-initiative-improve-tech-proficiency
Vavasseur, C. B. (2022, August 25). A rubric for effective Edtech use. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/rubric-effective-edtech-use
Wetzel, K., Buss, R., Foulger, T. S. & Lindsey, L. (2014) Infusing educational technology in teaching methods courses: Successes and dilemmas, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30:3, 89-103, DOI: 10.1080/21532974.2014.891877
Windchief, S. & San Pedro, T. (Eds.). (2019). Applying indigenous research methods: Storying with peoples and communities. Routledge.
Related exhibitors: | VEX Robotics, Inc., Canva for Education, Centric Learning, Class Technologies, Classter, Clever, MagicSchool AI, Google, Inc. |