Change display time — Currently: Central Daylight Time (CDT) (Event time)

Bridging Reality: AR, VR, XR for Life Skills Development in Special Education

,

Exploration Lab
Blended Content
Save to My Favorites

Session description

Discover how AR, VR, and XR technologies can create engaging, interactive learning experiences for students with intellectual disabilities, helping them develop essential life and occupational skills. This session will explore practical strategies and tools to foster independence & real-world readiness through immersive experiences to support skill mastery for diverse learners.

Outline

I. Introduction (10 minutes): Overview of AR, VR, and XR technologies, their potential for special education, and their role in life and occupational skills development. (Engagement: Brief survey using a polling tool to understand participants’ familiarity with these technologies)

II. The Need for Immersive Learning (10 minutes): Discuss the challenges students with intellectual disabilities face in traditional learning environments and how AR, VR, and XR can address these barriers. (Engagement: Real-world case studies and video examples)

III. Exploring AR, VR, and XR Tools (15 minutes): Introduce specific AR, VR, and XR tools and applications that are effective in teaching life and occupational skills. (Engagement: Demonstration of selected tools with hands-on exploration)

IV. Designing Immersive Learning Activities (15 minutes): Guide participants through designing a simple, immersive lesson/activity using AR, VR, or XR tailored for students with intellectual disabilities. (Engagement: Small group work and sharing of ideas)

V. Implementation and Best Practices (5 minutes): Share strategies, tips, and considerations for effectively integrating these technologies into the classroom. (Engagement: Open discussion and Q&A)

VI. Conclusion and Reflection (5 minutes): Recap key takeaways and discuss how to apply these concepts in participants’ educational settings. (Engagement: Participants share one action they plan to take based on what they've learned)

More [+]

Supporting research

This presentation is the beginning of the culmination of my doctoral research in studying the impact of augmented and virtual reality on students with intellectual disabilities in learning life and occupational skills. After a thorough review of the existing literature, it has been discovered that there are very few research studies that have been written about these immersive technologies for this population of students. While this area of research is expanding every day with the constant invention of new applications in this field, studies into the effectiveness of using these technologies to improve or acquire life and vocational skills for students with intellectual disabilities are only recently being written, and further research on their impact needs to be completed.

References:
Allcoat, D., & Von Mühlenen, A. (2018). Learning in virtual reality: Effects on performance,    emotion and engagement. Research in Learning Technology, 26.
 https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2140
Annafi, A., Hakim, D. L., & Rohendi, D. (2019). Impact of using augmented reality applications in the educational environment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1375(1), 012080.    https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1375/1/012080
Apostolellis, P., & Bowman, D. A. (2014). Evaluating the effects of orchestrated, game-based learning in virtual environments for informal education. Proceedings of the 11th     Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology.
 https://doi.org/10.1145/2663806.2663821
Arlati, S., Colombo, V., Ferrigno, G., Sacchetti, R., & Sacco, M. (2019). Virtual reality-based wheelchair simulators: A scoping review. Assistive Technology, 32(6), 294–305.
 https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2018.1553079
Armstrong, T. (2010). Neurodiversity: Discovering the extraordinary gifts of autism, ADHD,    dyslexia, and other brain differences. Da Capo Lifelong.
Asad, M. M., Naz, A., Churi, P., & Tahanzadeh, M. M. (2021). Virtual Reality as Pedagogical    Tool to Enhance Experiential Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Education    Research International, 2021, 1–17. 
 https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7061623

Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual    Environments, 6(4), 355–385.
 https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
Azuma, R. T. (2016). The most important challenge facing augmented reality. Presence:     Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 25(3), 234–238.
 https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00264
Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., and Kinshuk. (2014). Augmented reality trends in    education: A systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology &    Society, 17 (4), 133-149.
Bailenson, J.N. (2019). Experience on demand: What virtual reality is, how it works, and what it    can do. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Bailenson, J. N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., Lundblad, N., & Jin, M. (2008). The use of  immersive virtual reality in the Learning Sciences: Digital Transformations of teachers,    students, and social context. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 102–141.
 https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701793141
Baragash, R. S., Al-Samarraie, H., Moody, L., & Zaqout, F. (2020). Augmented reality and    functional skills acquisition among individuals with special needs: A meta-analysis of    group Design Studies. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37(1), 74–81.
 https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420910413
Billinghurst, M., & Duenser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7),    56–63.
 https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2012.111
Bouck, E. C., & Flanagan, S. M. (2010). Virtual manipulatives: What they are and how teachers    can use them. Intervention in School and Clinic, 45(3), 186–191.
 https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451209349530
Bowler, L. (2010). Digital literacy in the context of complex problem solving: An exploratory    study.
Brown, J., Sorrell, J. H., McLaren, J., & Creswell, J. W. (2006). Waiting for a liver transplant.    Qualitative Health Research, 16(1), 119-136.
 https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305284011
Cakir, R., & Korkmaz, O. (2019). The effectiveness of augmented reality environments on    individuals with special education needs. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2),  1631–1659.
 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9848-6
Carreon, A., Smith, S. J., & Rowland, A. (2019). Augmented reality: Creating and implementing    digital classroom supports. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(2), 109–115.
 https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419882423
Carreon, A., Smith, S. J., Mosher, M., Rao, K., & Rowland, A. (2020). A review of Virtual    Reality Intervention Research for students with disabilities in K–12 settings. Journal of    Special Education Technology, 37(1), 82–99.
 https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420962011
Casini, M. (2022). Extended reality for smart building operation and maintenance: A Review.    Energies, 15(10), 3785. 
 https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103785
Cheng, K.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). Affordances of Augmented Reality in Science Learning:    Suggestions For Future Research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4),    449–462.
 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9
Cihak, D. F., Moore, E. J., Wright, R. E., McMahon, D. D., Gibbons, M. M., & Smith, C. (2016).  Evaluating augmented reality to complete a chain task for elementary students with    autism. Journal of Special Education Technology, 31(2), 99–108.
 https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643416651724
Clark, F. A., Parham, D., Carlson, M. E., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Pierce, D., Wolfe, R. J., &    Zemke, R. (1991). Occupational science: Academic innovation in the service of     Occupational Therapy’s Future. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(4),    300–310.
 https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.45.4.300
Cobb, S. V., Nichols, S., Ramsey, A., & Wilson, J. R. (1999). Virtual reality-induced symptoms    and effects (VRISE). Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8 (2), 169–186.    https://doi.org/10.1162/105474699566152
Corning, A. (2020, July 27). Creating full sensory experiences: The future of AR/VR/MR/XR2.    Radiant Vision Systems. Retrieved December 13, 2022, from 
 https://www.radiantvisionsystems.com/blog/creating-full-sensory-experiences-future-ar/   vr/mr/xr
Cosgrove, P. B. (2018). Teaching an elusive phenomenon: Qualitative research, validity, and the    cover of the big tent. International Review of Qualitative Research, 11(3), 318-333.
Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.    Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods     approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Plano-Clark, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research    designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236-264.    https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287390
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2009). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual     environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32.
 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
Dede, C., Salzman, M. C., & Bowen Loftin, R. (1996). ScienceSpace: Virtual realities for    learning complex and abstract scientific concepts. Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 Virtual    Reality Annual International Symposium.
 https://doi.org/10.1109/vrais.1996.490534
de Vasconcelos, D. F., Júnior, E. A., de Oliveira Malaquias, F. F., Oliveira, L. A., & Cardoso, A.    (2020). A virtual reality based serious game to aid in the literacy of students with     intellectual disability: Design Principles and Evaluation. Technology and Disability,    32(3), 149–157.
 https://doi.org/10.3233/tad-200272

Dickey, M. D. (2005). Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: Two case studies    of Active Worlds as a medium for distance education. British Journal of Educational    Technology, 36(3), 439–451.
 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00477.x
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2008). Affordances and limitations of immersive    participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science    Education and Technology, 18(1), 7–22.
 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1
Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2017). An applied guide to research designs: Quantitative,    qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage Publications, Inc.
Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State    of the art and perspectives. 11th International Conference eLearning and Software for    Education. 
 https://doi.org/10.12753/2066-026x-15-020
Fuchs, P., Moreau, G., & Guitton, P. (2011). Virtual reality: Concepts and technologies.
 https://doi.org/10.1201/b11612
Gee, J. P. (2004). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Education +    Training, 46(4). 
 https://doi.org/10.1108/et.2004.00446dae.002
Hamalainen, R. (2008). Designing and evaluating collaboration in a virtual game environment    for Vocational Learning. Computers & Education, 50(1), 98–109.
 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.04.001
Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2020). Immersive virtual reality as a    pedagogical tool in education: A systematic literature review of quantitative learning    outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), 1–32.    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2
Herrero, J. F., & Lorenzo, G. (2019). An immersive virtual reality educational intervention on    people with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) for the development of communication    skills and problem solving. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1689–1722.    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10050-0
Huang, H.-M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S.-S. (2010). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual    reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers &     Education, 55(3), 1171–1182.
 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.014
Hwang, W.-Y., & Hu, S.-S. (2013). Analysis of peer learning behaviors using multiple     representations in virtual reality and their impacts on geometry problem solving.     Computers & Education, 62, 308–319.
 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.005
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., and Freeman, A. (2015). NMC horizon report: 2015    K-12 edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Joiner, I. A. (2018). Emerging library technologies: It's not just for geeks. Chandos Publishing,    an imprint of Elsevier.
Jones, G., & Warren, S. J. (2011). Issues and concerns of K-12 educators on 3-D multi-user    virtual environments in formal classroom settings. International Journal of Gaming and    Computer-Mediated Simulations, 3(1), 1–12.
 https://doi.org/10.4018/jgcms.2011010101
Kaimara, P., Oikonomou, A. C., Deliyannis, I., Papadopoulou, A., Miliotis, G., Fokides, E., &    Floros, A. (2021). Waking up in the morning (WUIM): A transmedia project for daily    living skills training. Technology and Disability, 33(2), 137–161.
 https://doi.org/10.3233/tad-200326
Kandalaft, M. R., Didehbani, N., Krawczyk, D. C., Allen, T. T., & Chapman, S. B. (2012).    Virtual reality social cognition training for young adults with high-functioning autism.    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(1), 34–44.
 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1544-6
Kaplan, A. D., Cruit, J., Endsley, M., Beers, S. M., Sawyer, B. D., & Hancock, P. A. (2020). The    effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality as training enhancement    methods: A meta-analysis. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and    Ergonomics Society, 63(4), 706–726.
 https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820904229
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential    learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2),    193–212.
 https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2014). Experiential learning theory: Previous    research and new directions. Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles,    227–248.
  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605986-9
Köse, H., & Güner-Yildiz, N. (2020). Augmented reality (AR) as a learning material in special    needs education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1921–1936.
 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10326-w
Krokos, E., Plaisant, C., & Varshney, A. (2018). Virtual memory palaces: Immersion aids     recall. Virtual Reality, 23(1), 1–15.
 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0346-3
Lee, E. A.-L., & Wong, K. W. (2014). Learning with desktop virtual reality: Low spatial ability    learners are more positively affected. Computers & Education, 79, 49–58.
 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.010
Lee, I.-J., Chen, C.-H., Wang, C.-P., & Chung, C.-H. (2018). Augmented reality plus concept    map technique to teach children with ASD to use social cues when meeting and greeting.    The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(3), 227–243.
 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0382-5
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2019). Practical research: Planning and design (12th ed.). Pearson    Education, Inc.
Li, Y. (Joy), Li, Z., & Zhang, C. (2022). A Review of Immersive Virtual Reality in Special    Education. 2022 Proceedings of the EDSIG Conference, 8(5826), 1–12.

Lin, H. C., & Wuang, Y. P. (2012). Strength and agility training in adolescents with Down    syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(6),    2236–2244. 
 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.06.017
Lin, T.-J., Duh, H. B.-L., Li, N., Wang, H.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). An investigation of learners’    collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an     augmented reality simulation system. Computers & Education, 68, 314–321.
 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.011
Lino, F., Arcangeli, V., & Chieffo, D. P. R. (2021). The Virtual Challenge: Virtual Reality Tools    for Intervention in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. Children, 8(4),    270.
 https://doi.org/10.3390/children8040270
Lowood, H. E. (2022, September 8). virtual reality. Encyclopedia Britannica.
 https://www.britannica.com/technology/virtual-reality
Maas, M. J., & Hughes, J. M. (2020). Virtual, augmented and mixed reality in K–12 education: A  review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 231–249.
 https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2020.1737210
Maxwell, J. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational    Review, 62(3), 279-300.
McMahon, D. (2019). Getting started with Virtual Reality as Assistive Technology.
 Closing the Gap, 29–34.
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014).     Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12    and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40.
 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033
Merriam, S., & Tisdell, E. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation    (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Michalski, S. C., Szpak, A., Ellison, C., Cornish, R., & Loetscher, T. (2022). Using Virtual    Reality to Improve Classroom Behavior in People With Down Syndrome: Within-    Subjects Experimental Design. JMIR Serious Games, 10(2), e34373.
 https://doi.org/10.2196/34373
Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE     Transactions on Information Systems, E77-D(12), 1321-1329. Retrieved from
 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231514051
Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1995). Augmented reality: A class of    displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. SPIE Proceedings. 
 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.197321
Milovanovic, J., Moreau, G., Siret, D., & Miguet, F. (2017). Virtual and augmented reality in    architectural design and education. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference,    CAAD Futures.

Mosher, M. A., & Carreon, A. C. (2021). Teaching social skills to students with autism spectrum    disorder through augmented, virtual and mixed reality. Research in Learning Technology,  29.
 https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2626
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
Nadolny, L. (2016). Interactive print: The design of cognitive tasks in blended augmented reality    and print documents. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 814–823.
 https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12462
Norum, K. E. (2008). Natural setting. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of     Qualitative Research Methods (p. 551). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Optale, G. (2000). How and where does virtual reality immersion affect brain and mind.     PsycEXTRA Dataset. 
 https://doi.org/10.1037/e705372011-024
Pandey, V., & Vaughn, L. (2021). The Potential of Virtual Reality in Social Skills Training for    Autism: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Adoption of Virtual Reality in     Occupational Therapy Practice. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 9(3), 1–12.    https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1808
Parsons, S., & Cobb, S. (2011). State-of-the-art of Virtual Reality Technologies for children on    the autism spectrum. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26(3), 355–366.    https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2011.593831

Patterson, T., & Han, I. (2019). Learning to teach with virtual reality: Lessons from one     elementary teacher. TechTrends, 63(4), 463–469.
 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00401-6
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and    practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pietkiewicz, I., & Smith, J. A. (2012). A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological  analysis in qualitative research psychology. Psychological Journal, 18(2), 361-369.
Pilgrim, J., & Pilgrim, J. M. (2016). The use of virtual reality tools in the reading-language arts    classroom. Texas Journal of Literacy Education, 4(2), 90–97.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In R. S. Valle & S. Halling    (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology (pp. 41-60). Plenum.
Prajapati, R., Sharma, B., & Sharma, D. (2016). Significance of Life Skills Education.     Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 10(1), 1–6.
 https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v10i1.9875
Purugganan, O. (2018). Intellectual disabilities. Pediatrics In Review, 39(6), 299–309.
 https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2016-0116
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of    immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, Lessons    learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778.
 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778

Radu, I. (2014). Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and cross-media analysis.    Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1533–1543.
 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y
Rizzo, A. A., Bowerly, T., Buckwalter, J. G., Klimchuk, D., Mitura, R., & Parsons, T. D. (2009).    A virtual reality scenario for all seasons:the virtual classroom. CNS Spectrums, 11(1), 35–   44. 
 https://doi.org/10.1017/s1092852900024196
Roberts, C. (2010). The dissertation journey: A practical and comprehensive guide to planning,    writing, and defending your dissertation (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.
Rose, F. D., Brooks, Barbara. M., & Rizzo, A. A. (2005). Virtual reality in brain damage     rehabilitation: Review. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(3), 241–262.
 https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.241
Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative    research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ryan Oakes, L. (2022). Virtual Reality among Individuals with Intellectual and/or     Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Literature Review. Therapeutic Recreation    Journal, 56(3), 281–299.
 https://doi.org/10.18666/TRJ-2022-V56-I3-11184
Rakkolainen, I., Farooq, A., Kangas, J., Hakulinen, J., Rantala, J., Turunen, M., & Raisamo, R.    (2021). Technologies for multimodal interaction in extended reality—a scoping review.    Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(12), 81.
 https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5120081
Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Santoso, H. B., Wang, J.-C., & Windasari, N. A. (2022). Impact of multisensory extended reality    on tourism experience journey. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 13(3),    356–385.
 https://doi.org/10.1108/jhtt-01-2021-0036
Schmalstieg, D., & Höllerer, T. (2016). Augmented reality: Principles and practice. Addison-   Wesley.
Sherman, W. R., Craig, A. B., & Bolas, M. T. (2019). Understanding virtual reality: Interface,    application, and design. Morgan Kaufmann publishers, an imprint of Elsevier.
Singer, J. (1999). Why can't you be normal for once in your life?: From a 'Problem with No    Name' to a new category of disability. In Corker, M. and French, S. (Eds.). Disability    Discourse Open University Press UK
Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016). Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality.    Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3.
 https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00074
Smith, J. (2011). Evaluating the contributions of interpretative phenomenological analysis.    Health Psychology Review, 5(1), 9-27.
 https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory,  method, and research. Sage.
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
Thomas, D. (2003). A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. American Journal  of Evaluation, 27(2), 2-10.
Thorson, S. (2021, December 1). Welcome to XR and immersive experiences. Ericsson. Retrieved  December 13, 2022, from https://www.ericsson.com/en/blog/2021/11/welcome-to-xr-   immersive-experiences
Toffalini, E., Meneghetti, C., Carretti, B., & Lanfranchi, S. (2017). Environment learning from    virtual exploration in individuals with Down Syndrome: The role of perspective and    sketch maps. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 62(1), 30–40.
 https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12445
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive    pedagogy. State University of New York Press.
Van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in      phenomenological research and writing. Routledge.
Vert, S., & Andone, D. (2019). Virtual reality authoring tools for educators. ITM Web of     Conferences, 29, 03008.
 https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20192903008
Walker, Z., Vasquez, E., & Wienke, W. (2016). The Impact of Simulated Interviews for     Individuals with Intellectual Disability. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,    19(1), 76-88.
Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and    challenges of augmented reality in Education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49.    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
Yakubova, G., Kellems, R. O., Chen, B. B., & Cusworth, Z. (2021). Practitioners’ attitudes and    perceptions toward the use of augmented and virtual reality technologies in the education    of students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37(2), 286–296.    https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434211004445
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:    Sage.

More [+]

Presenters

Photo
Chief Technology Officer
Niles Township School District 219
Graduate student

Session specifications

Topic:

Emergent Technologies, AR, VR, and XR

TLP:

Yes

Grade level:

6-12

Audience:

Curriculum Designer/Director, Teacher, Technology Coach/Trainer

Attendee devices:

Devices useful

Attendee device specification:

Smartphone: Android, iOS
Laptop: Chromebook, Mac, PC
Tablet: Android, iOS

Participant accounts, software and other materials:

Several platforms and Apps will be discussed that enable both Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality to work.

Subject area:

Special Education, Vocational

ISTE Standards:

For Educators:
Designer
  • Use technology to create, adapt and personalize learning experiences that foster independent learning and accommodate learner differences and needs.
Facilitator
  • Create learning opportunities that challenge students to use a design process and/or computational thinking to innovate and solve problems.
For Students:
Empowered Learner
  • Use technology to seek feedback that informs and improves their practice and to demonstrate their learning in a variety of ways.

TLPs:

Ensure Equity, Connect learning to learner
Related exhibitors:
Merge,
ClassVR,
Thinkverse,
zSpace, Inc.