Change display time — Currently: Central Daylight Time (CDT) (Event time)

Get them talking! How to foster better discussion in all classrooms

,
Virtual

Interactive Session
ISTELive Content
Virtual Session
Save to My Favorites

Session description

Discussion & collaboration in virtual and blended-learning spaces differ from physical classrooms, requiring intentional planning and lesson design. This presentation explores frameworks, strategies, and tools to help teachers create virtual discussion spaces that foster interactive discussions in any classroom environment and are perfect for anyone including discussion in their classroom.

Outline

This will an interactive, online session (virtual session only).

Opening - 10 minutes
Presenters will share the context and background of the session (ie: why discussion is so important to student learning)

Attendee Participation - 10 minutes
Participants will engage in an activity designed to get them thinking about what different strategies and tools that promote discussion in physical classrooms. The presenters will have attendees brainstorm how discussion will look different in virtual spaces, how it can look the same, and how digital discussions in in-person settings can support inclusive teaching.

Mini-lesson - 15 minutes
Presenters will share how the SAMR and TPACK models can support discussions in virtual spaces using examples from a variety of disciplines (social studies, science, English).

Presenters will also share how digital discussions within physical classroom spaces can also be effective for students who are reluctant to share their thinking with the larger group, but can feel seen behind the computer screen.

Presenters will share six tools that work for discussion. These will be brief introductions to the tools, but will be used to support attendees looking to add to their teaching toolbox.

Attendee Partcipation - 10 minutes
Attendees will have workshop time where they will take an existing activity from their classes and plan for discussion in their spaces. They will also be encouraged to share their favorite discussion tools in a collaborative Padlet that attendees can have access to longer after the session has ended.

More [+]

Supporting research

References

Beschorner, B., & Woodward, L. (2019). Long-term planning for technology in literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 73(3), 325–337.

Code, J., Ralph, R., & Forde, K. (2020). Pandemic designs for the future: Perspectives of technology education teachers during COVID-19. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 419–431.

Copeland, M. (2005). Socratic circles: Fostering critical and creative thinking in middle and high school. Stenhouse Publishers.

Elkordy, A., & Keneman, A. F. (2019). Design ed: Connecting learning science research to practice. International Society for Technology in Education.

Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Hattie, J. A. C. (2016). Visible learning for literacy: Implementing the practices that work best to accelerate student learning: grades K-12. Corwin.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Hofer, M. J., Bell, L. B., Glen, L., Barry III, R. Q., Cohen, J. D.; Garcia, N., George, M. A., Harris, J., Jacoby III, A. H., Kim, R., Kjellstrom, W., Koehler, M. J., Lee, J. K., Mann, L., Mishra, P., Patel, Y., Shoffner, M. Slykhuis, D. A., Strutchens, M. E., & Zellner, A. L., (2015). Practitioner's guide to technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK): Rich media cases of teacher knowledge. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. Routledge.

Koehler, M., Mishra, P. (2012). Tpack Image. TPACK Org. http://tpack.org.

Lent, R. L. C. (2016). This is disciplinary literacy: Reading, writing, thinking, and doing . . . content area by content area. Corwin, a SAGE company.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Morrell, E. (2005). Critical English education. English Education, 37(4), 312-321.

Puentedura, R. R. (2015). SAMR: A brief introduction. hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2015/10/SAMR_ABriefIntro.pdf

Rollins, S. P. (2014). Learning in the fast lane: 8 ways to put All students on the road to academic success. ASCD.

Teaching Tolerance. (2016). Reading diversity: A tool for selecting diverse texts. Extended edition. https://www.tolerance.org/sites/default/files/2017-10/Teaching-Tolerance-Reading-Diversity-Extended-Edition-2016-VFF.pdf

Vasquez, V. M. (2014). Negotiating critical literacies with young children. Routledge.

Wolsey, T. D. V., & Lapp, D. (2017). Literacy in the disciplines: A teacher's guide for grades 5-12. Guilford Press, a Division of Guilford Publications, Inc.

Ziemke, K., & Muhtaris, K. (2020). Read the world: Rethinking literacy for empathy and action in a digital age. Heinemann.

More [+]

Presenters

Photo
Associate Professor
SUNY Brockport
Photo
Teacher Educator
SUNY Brockport
ISTE Certified Educator
Photo
Associate Professor
SUNY Brockport

Session specifications

Topic:

Virtual and Blended Learning

TLP:

No

Grade level:

PK-12

Audience:

Teacher Development, Teacher, Technology Coach/Trainer

Attendee devices:

Devices useful

Attendee device specification:

Smartphone: Android, iOS, Windows
Laptop: Chromebook, Mac, PC
Tablet: iOS, Windows, Android

Subject area:

Elementary/Multiple Subjects, Teacher Education

ISTE Standards:

For Educators:
Learner
  • Stay current with research that supports improved student learning outcomes, including findings from the learning sciences.
Designer
  • Apply evidence-based instructional design principles to create innovative and equitable digital learning environments that support learning.
Analyst
  • Provide alternative ways for students to demonstrate competency and reflect on their learning using technology.