Menu
Educators are charged with teaching and demonstrating the flexibility of thinking in different ways but are rarely taught how to present, develop or assess these skills. In this session, participants explore learning and cognition through an applied approach using thinking frameworks, visual literacy, and digital tools. Special attention is given to translating cognitive and learning sciences findings into strategies, materials, interventions, and thinking routines for educational settings. Participants explore digital tools for modeling and sharing thinking as well as scaffolding frameworks, visual tools, and protocols. The ethical and social-justice implications of thinking and cognition are considered from a critical lens. Topics include critical thinking and problem-solving, creative thinking, design thinking, systems thinking, and positive thinking.
Introduction - How do we know what our learners are thinking? (10 mins)
Participant poll
Understanding visual strategies for assessment - what can we learn and how? (15 mins)
Participants view examples and discuss in small groups or padlet
Recognizing connections and misconceptions in learning through concept maps and other graphics (10 mins)
Participants collaborate to identify possible uses for images(applications)
Shaping thinking using routines or protocols (10 mins)
Wrap up
throughout, participants will be encouraged to ask questions and contribute through chat and a backchannel
Brief listing - Elkordy, A. & Keneman, A. (2019). Design ed: Connecting learning sciences research to practice. ISTE.
Howard-Jones, P. (2008). Fostering Creative Thinking: co-constructed insights from neuroscience and education.
Illinois ACEs Response Collaborative. (2008). Education Brief: ACEs for Educators and Stakeholders. Retrieved from http://www.hmprg.org/wp-content/themes/HMPRG/backup/ACEs/Education%20Policy%20Brief.pdf.
Laurillard, D. (2015). Teaching as a Design Science.
Mensah, F. M. (2021). Culturally Relevant and Culturally Responsive. Science and Children, 58(4).
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. National Academies Press.
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important?. Review of educational research, 82(3), 330-348.
Salmon, D. & Kelly, M. (2014). Using concept mapping to foster adaptive expertise: Enhancing teacher metacognitive learning to improve student academic performance. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Shao, Y., Zhang, C., Zhou, J., Gu, T., & Yuan, Y. (2019). How does culture shape creativity? A mini-review. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1219.
Sylwester, R. (1994). How emotions affect learning. Educational Leadership (Vol. 52, pp. 60–65).
Yadav, A., Good, J., Voogt, J., & Fisser, P. (2017). Computational thinking as an emerging competence domain. In Competence-based vocational and professional education (pp. 1051-1067). Springer, Cham.
Zaretta Hammond "Culturally Responsive Teaching" at the San Francisco Public Library https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ME8KjqyqthM