Event Information
1. Welcome and Framing the Challenge (5 minutes)
• Brief overview of the problem: why gifted learners disengage.
• Quick audience poll (using Mentimeter or chat board) on what disengagement looks like in their classrooms.
• Set purpose: AI as a tool for curiosity and agency, not just acceleration.
2. Story and Context (10 minutes)
• Share examples from the Brainy Builders STEAM Club and classroom practice.
• Highlight real student projects that reconnected learners to purpose and creativity.
• Encourage participants to share similar challenges or successes in small table groups.
3. Exploring AI Tools and Frameworks (15 minutes)
• Demonstrate age-appropriate AI tools for inquiry, design, and problem solving.
• Participants explore prompts and discuss in pairs how these tools could extend learning for gifted or twice-exceptional students.
• Quick share-out of best ideas using a collaborative Padlet or Jamboard.
4. Building the “AI Challenge Planner” (20 minutes)
• Participants use the provided template to design one mini-project or challenge idea for their students.
• Facilitated peer feedback round (pair and share or table rotation).
• Optional QR code access to curated AI resources and ethical use guidelines.
5. Reflection and Next Steps (10 minutes)
• Group discussion: “What will this look like in your classroom next month?”
• Participants outline one concrete next step for implementation.
• Exit ticket or digital form to capture action plans and resource requests.
Engagement Tactics
• Peer-to-peer dialogue every 10–15 minutes.
• Interactive tech tools (polls, Padlet/Jamboard, QR code templates).
• Visual examples from authentic student work.
• Real-time resource creation through collaborative discussion and feedback.
Attendees will leave with an “AI Challenge Planner,” a ready-to-use template for designing student-driven projects that spark curiosity and deepen engagement for gifted learners. They will also draft an initial action plan outlining how to integrate ethical, inclusive AI use in a classroom or enrichment program.
Supporting Research
1. National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC). Affective Needs of Gifted Learners. https://nagc.org
2. Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the Role of Gifted Education and Talent Development for the 21st Century. Gifted Child Quarterly.
3. Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classrooms. ASCD.
4. Darling-Hammond, L. et al. (2020). The Future of Teaching and Learning: How AI Can Support Equity and Innovation. Learning Policy Institute.
5. ISTE & ASCD. (2023). Practical AI Strategies for Educators. https://iste.org/AI
6. Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House.
7. Hammond, Z. (2015). Culturally Responsive Teaching and the Brain. Corwin Press.
8. Holmes, W. et al. (2022). The Ethics of AI in Education: Practices, Risks, and Opportunities. UNESCO.
9. National Science Teaching Association (NSTA). (2024). AI and Inquiry-Based STEM Learning. https://nsta.org
10. Florida, R. & Goodnight, J. (2005). Managing for Creativity. Harvard Business Review.