MORE EVENTS
Leadership
Exchange
Solutions
Summit
DigCit
Connect
Change display time — Currently: Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) (Event time)

Designing Your Teacher Preparation Program Curriculum for Technology Infusion

,
Virtual

Listen and learn: Panel
Streaming Session
Recorded Session
Presented Virtually
Save to My Favorites

Presenters

Photo
Professor
Iowa State University
@SchmidtCrawford
@dacrawford34
Dr. Denise Schmidt is a Professor and Director of the Center for Technology in Learning and Teaching in the School of Education at Iowa State University. Denise’s research examines the effects of using technology as a teaching and learning tool to facilitate renewal in both teacher education and PK-12 schools. She is an editor for the Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education (JDLTE). Denise received the Award for Excellence in Teacher Education (2016) presented by the International Society of Technology in Education (ISTE) and the Making IT Happen Award (2017) from the Iowa Technology and Education Connection (ITEC).
Photo
Professor of Mathematics Education
University of Dayton
Shannon Driskell is a Professor of Mathematics Education in the Department of Mathematics at the University of Dayton in Dayton, Ohio. Her research focuses on the use of technology to support teaching and learning of mathematics, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), mathematical content knowledge for teaching, mathematical mindsets of both preservice and inservice teachers, and digital curriculum.
Photo
Professor
Nevada State College
Kevin is a contributor/co-editor of Championing Technology Infusion in Teacher Preparation: A Framework for Supporting Future Educators, and a Professor of Teacher Education at Nevada State College. Kevin has co-authored international research that led to the development of the Teacher Educator Technology Competencies (TETCs). He has served as the chair of the Consultative Council for SITE, the chair AACTE’s Committee on Innovation and Technology, and the co-chair of SITE’s mobile learning SIG. Kevin is the editor of CITE- General. He is also a contributor/co-editor of Online Teaching in K-12: Models, Methods, and Best Practices for Teachers and Administrators.
Photo
Faculty
Marymount University
Elizabeth Langran, Ph.D., co-author of Navigating Place-based Learning: Mapping for a Better World, is a Professor of Education at Marymount University, USA, and past-president of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education. She has taught secondary and post-secondary students in the US, Morocco, and Switzerland and holds a doctorate in Instructional Technology from the University of Virginia. She educates and mentors online doctoral students and pre- and in-service teachers in the Washington, DC area.
Photo
Dean
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
@ChrystallaMouz
Dr. Chrystalla Mouza is Dean of the College of Education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She previously served as Director & Distinguished Professor of Teacher Education in the School of Education at the University of Delaware. She earned an Ed.D., M.Ed, and M.A. in Instructional Technology and Media from Columbia University (Teachers College) and completed post-doctoral work at the Educational Testing Service (ETS). She has expertise in teacher learning, applications of technology in K-12 classrooms, and computer science education.
Photo
Assistant Professor
New Mexico State University
Melissa Warr is an Assistant Professor of Learning Design and Technology at New Mexico State University. Her research blends teacher education, design, creativity, and technology. She is currently exploring design perspectives in teaching and teacher education, including what and how teachers learn when they design media for learning. She also studies creative design approaches to helping teachers address problems of practice, including applying creative tools to support teachers in making sense of their practice. She is a violinist and regularly performs with religious and community groups. Her scholarship is available at http://melissa-warr.com.

Session description

A “technology infusion” model prepares teacher candidates using a programwide, program-deep approach. This type of curriculum provides technology models and learning opportunities across multiple courses. We will focus on steps and considerations teacher preparation programs can take in creating and sustaining a technology-infused curriculum across courses.

Purpose & objective

This session is intended to provide participants with technology-infusion curriculum design strategies that are context-specific. Our findings are explored in depth in our forthcoming special issue article in Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, “Curriculum Design for Technology Infusion Requires a Continuous Collaborative Process.”

Preparing teacher candidates to effectively utilize digital technologies to support learning should be a central goal of teacher preparation programs. However, infusing technology into teacher education can be challenging because of the rapid pace of technological change as well as the importance of connecting technology to multiple content areas (TPACK), suggesting the technology curriculum should span multiple courses, instructors, and field experiences.

Because of the need to address technology standards and competencies throughout the teacher education curriculum, care must be taken to ensure the resulting program illustrates coherence. Teacher preparation programs that illustrate coherence—that present “coherent visions of teaching and learning and that integrate related strategies across courses and field placements” have a stronger impact on teacher candidates (Darling-Hammond et al., 2005, p. 392). We will present the three primary elements of a coherent teacher preparation program: content, process, and context.

We start by discussing the curriculum design process, including the challenges of developing a technology curriculum for EPPs, qualities of successful EPPs, and considerations for the process of curriculum development. We argue that key stakeholders should be involved in the development of the curriculum and that the curriculum design process must be ongoing and responsive to the context, including the dynamics of the institution and social context. Next, we explore content; we provide a brief overview of competencies and standards (specifically ISTE Standards for Educators) relevant to teacher education and technology. Finally, we consider the process of the EPP technology curriculum by describing a continuum of approaches for technology in pre-service teacher education curriculum. We offer research-based models specific to these approaches, including the efficacy of both single technology-focused courses and programs that infuse technology standards throughout the curriculum.

More [+]

Outline

Each panelist will be asked to answer and discuss 1-2 of the following topics, and will address how the model can be contextualized for size of teacher preparation program, minority-serving institution, graduate versus undergraduate, standalone versus infused models, etc. Specific steps will be identified, according to each institution’s context and where they are in the process of curriculum design for their existing program. Additionally, there will be time for discussion among the panelists and the participants about how each participant can take concrete steps in the technology infusion curriculum design process.
I. Introductions & Defining Technology Infusion (10 min)
a. The challenges facing teacher education to prepare teachers to effectively use technology in the classroom
II. Who is involved in curriculum design and when does it happen (5 min)
a. Identifying key stakeholders, collaborative processes
b. Ongoing – how to address whether an initial start, or revisiting existing curriculum
III. Competencies, standards, and principles as a driver of curriculum design (5 min)
a. ISTE Standards for Educators, InTASC, TETCs, and EPP Pledge for Digital Equity and Transformation
IV. The continuum of approaches (10 min)
a. Standalone technology course, infused models, hybrids
b. How does this differ according to a program’s context?
c. What does the research tell us about these models?
V. Q & A, Discussion (15 min)
a. What will your institution do next in this process?

More [+]

Supporting research

Darling-Hammond, L., Hammerness, K., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 390–441). Wiley.

Foulger, T. S., Graziano, K. J., Schmidt-Crawford, D. A., & Slykhuis, D. A. (2017). Teacher educator technology competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 413–448 Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/181966/

Sprague, D.R., Williamson, J. & Foulger, T.S. (2022). Design Guidelines for Post-COVID Era Preparation Programs: Action Steps Toward Technology Infusion. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 30(2), 177-187. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education

More [+]

Session specifications

Topic:
Teacher education
Grade level:
Community college/university
Skill level:
Beginner
Audience:
Teacher education/higher ed faculty
Attendee devices:
Devices useful
Attendee device specification:
Laptop: Chromebook, Mac, PC
Tablet: Android, iOS, Windows
ISTE Standards:
For Coaches:
Professional Learning Facilitator
  • Evaluate the impact of professional learning and continually make improvements in order to meet the schoolwide vision for using technology for high-impact teaching and learning.
For Education Leaders:
Empowering Leader
  • Build the confidence and competency of educators to put the ISTE Standards for Students and Educators into practice.
For Educators:
Designer
  • Design authentic learning activities that align with content area standards and use digital tools and resources to maximize active, deep learning.