Picture This! Digital Literacy of Images |
Listen and learn : Snapshot
Snapshots are a pairing of two 20 minute presentations followed by a 5 minute Q & A.
This is presentation 2 of 2, scroll down to see more details.
Other presentations in this group:
Audience: | Library media specialists, Teachers |
Skill level: | Beginner |
Attendee devices: | Devices useful |
Attendee device specification: | Smartphone: Android, iOS, Windows Laptop: Chromebook, Mac, PC Tablet: Android, iOS, Windows |
Participant accounts, software and other materials: | Access to the internet for the games. |
Topic: | Digital citizenship |
Grade level: | 6-12 |
ISTE Standards: | For Educators: Citizen
|
Purpose: To show teachers how to address digital literacy using images.
Objectives: (a) To identify different ways an image can be manipulated. (b) To examine
historical situations and the effect of image manipulation. (c) To identify ways to
determine the authenticity of an image. (d) To examine graphical statistical information
for emotional manipulation.
Activities: (a) Real or Fake Game, (b) Polling, (c) Meme generator (to show the effect of
images with few words)
5 min. Introductory Real or Fake image game. First play.
15 min. Exploring images in print.
5 min. Discuss vocabulary (like propaganda vs. satire)
5 min. Polling engagement – how do people rate images, what words do they attach to
an image?
5 min. Meme generator – live example. How does it change the image? Input from
audience to change it.
5 min. Ideas from presenter and audience on sharing these lessons with students.
10 min. Statistical charts – what do they say? How do they say it? What affects your
understanding?
5 min. Chart game – what does it mean?
5 min. Q&A
Beck, T. S. (2016). Shaping Images : Scholarly Perspectives on Image Manipulation.
Berlin: De Gruyter Saur.
https://edu.gcfglobal.org/en/digital-media-literacy/the-problem-with-photomanipulation/1/
Shen, C., Kasra, M., Pan, W., Bassett, G. A., Malloch, Y., & O’Brien, J. F. (2019). Fake
images: The effects of source, intermediary, and digital media literacy on contextual
assessment of image credibility online. New Media & Society, 21(2), 438–463.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799526