Event Information
Content and Engagement:
Poster displays four-phase bee democracy process with visual workflow and research backing. Participants engage in hands-on consensus-building exercise using actual educational technology adoption scenario. Activities include practicing "waggle dance" communication techniques, experiencing structured debate protocols, and applying decision thresholds to real challenges.
Time:
Continuous 90-minute experience with participants joining and leaving organically. Each small group (3-5 people) works through complete 15-20 minute bee democracy simulation while presenter facilitates multiple groups simultaneously.
Process:
As attendees arrive, presenter introduces bee democracy concept using poster visuals, then invites them to join active simulation groups. Participants experience scout phase information gathering (5 minutes), structured debate using energy allocation methods (7-10 minutes), and consensus threshold practice (5-8 minutes). Throughout session, presenter circulates between groups, demonstrates key techniques, and provides take-away templates. Peer-to-peer interaction occurs naturally as groups observe and learn from each other's decision-making processes.
After this session, participants will be able to:
- Implement the four-phase bee democracy process for complex educational decisions
- Design stakeholder engagement protocols that prevent both analysis paralysis and rushed decisions
- Facilitate discussions where diverse perspectives strengthen rather than fragment decision-making
- Create commitment structures that ensure whole-system buy-in for chosen directions
- Apply consensus-building strategies to technology adoption, curriculum changes, and professional development planning
Seeley, T.D. (2010). Honeybee Democracy. Princeton University Press.
Seeley, T.D. (1995). The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies. Harvard University Press.
Woolley, A.W., Chabris, C.F., et al. (2010). Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups. Science, 330, 686-688.
Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few. Anchor Books.
Woolley, A.W., Aggarwal, I., Malone, T.W. (2015). Collective Intelligence and Group Performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6).
California Management Review (2019). Leaders can make better decisions by tapping into the collaborative intelligence of their organizations.
Harney, O.M., Wegerif, R., et al. (2023). Education for Collective Intelligence. International Journal of Research & Method in Education.
Bonabeau, E., Meyer, C. (2001). Swarm Intelligence: A Whole New Way to Think About Business. Harvard Business Review.
Carnegie Mellon University (2025). Using Principles of Swarm Intelligence, Study Compared Platforms for Large Group Brainstorming.
Thomas Seeley research at Cornell University Department of Neurobiology and Behavior.
Posters in this theme: