Change display time — Currently: Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) (Event time)

How Do 50,000 Bees Make Better Decisions Than Your School Committee?

,

Poster
Poster Theme: AI
Save to My Favorites

Session description

Experience nature's most effective decision-making process through hands-on activities that transform how your team approaches educational technology adoption, curriculum changes, and stakeholder engagement. Learn how honeybee colonies achieve consensus without conflict, and apply these research-backed strategies to your most challenging collaborative decisions.

Outline

Content and Engagement:
Poster displays four-phase bee democracy process with visual workflow and research backing. Participants engage in hands-on consensus-building exercise using actual educational technology adoption scenario. Activities include practicing "waggle dance" communication techniques, experiencing structured debate protocols, and applying decision thresholds to real challenges.

Time:
Continuous 90-minute experience with participants joining and leaving organically. Each small group (3-5 people) works through complete 15-20 minute bee democracy simulation while presenter facilitates multiple groups simultaneously.

Process:
As attendees arrive, presenter introduces bee democracy concept using poster visuals, then invites them to join active simulation groups. Participants experience scout phase information gathering (5 minutes), structured debate using energy allocation methods (7-10 minutes), and consensus threshold practice (5-8 minutes). Throughout session, presenter circulates between groups, demonstrates key techniques, and provides take-away templates. Peer-to-peer interaction occurs naturally as groups observe and learn from each other's decision-making processes.

More [+]

Outcomes

After this session, participants will be able to:

- Implement the four-phase bee democracy process for complex educational decisions
- Design stakeholder engagement protocols that prevent both analysis paralysis and rushed decisions
- Facilitate discussions where diverse perspectives strengthen rather than fragment decision-making
- Create commitment structures that ensure whole-system buy-in for chosen directions
- Apply consensus-building strategies to technology adoption, curriculum changes, and professional development planning

More [+]

Supporting research

Seeley, T.D. (2010). Honeybee Democracy. Princeton University Press.

Seeley, T.D. (1995). The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies. Harvard University Press.

Woolley, A.W., Chabris, C.F., et al. (2010). Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups. Science, 330, 686-688.

Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few. Anchor Books.

Woolley, A.W., Aggarwal, I., Malone, T.W. (2015). Collective Intelligence and Group Performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6).

California Management Review (2019). Leaders can make better decisions by tapping into the collaborative intelligence of their organizations.

Harney, O.M., Wegerif, R., et al. (2023). Education for Collective Intelligence. International Journal of Research & Method in Education.

Bonabeau, E., Meyer, C. (2001). Swarm Intelligence: A Whole New Way to Think About Business. Harvard Business Review.

Carnegie Mellon University (2025). Using Principles of Swarm Intelligence, Study Compared Platforms for Large Group Brainstorming.

Thomas Seeley research at Cornell University Department of Neurobiology and Behavior.

More [+]

Presenters

Photo
Learning Specialist
Compass: Partners in Learning

Posters in this theme:

Session specifications

Topic:

Professional Learning and Development

Audience:

Curriculum Designer/Director, District-Level Leadership, School Level Leadership

Attendee devices:

Devices not needed

Subject area:

Technology Education, Not applicable

ISTE Standards:

For Coaches: Change Agent
For Education Leaders: Visionary Planner
For Educators: Collaborator